Instructional Quality Commission Is Seeking Science Teachers – Applications Due November 15
Posted: Friday, October 11th, 2013
The IQC has many roles, and science will be its focus in the near future – members with science teaching experience have not been on the IQC for some time and are truly needed now that CA is moving forward with Next Generation Science Standards.
The California State Board of Education (SBE) is now accepting applications for practicing science teachers to serve on the Instructional Quality Commission (IQC). This high-level commission is responsible for advising the SBE on matters related to curriculum and instruction. The IQC (1) develops and recommends curriculum frameworks; (2) develops and recommends criteria for evaluating instructional materials submitted for adoption; (3) evaluates instructional materials that have been submitted by publishers and makes recommendations to adopt or reject each submission; (4) recommends policies and activities to the SBE, the California Department of Education (CDE), and local education agencies regarding curriculum and instruction; and (5) advises and makes recommendations to the SBE on implementing the state’s academic content standards. Applications are due 5:00 pm, November 15, 2013.
The IQC, formerly known as the Curriculum Development and Supplemental Materials Commission, consists of 18 members, 13 of whom are appointed by the SBE upon the recommendation of the State Superintendent of Public Instruction or the members of the SBE. At any one time, at least seven of the public members are current classroom teachers, or mentor teachers, or both, who are assigned to teach in grades K-12.
The IQC is responsible for advising the SBE on matters related to curriculum and instruction. The IQC (1) develops and recommends curriculum frameworks; (2) develops and recommends criteria for evaluating instructional materials submitted for adoption; (3) evaluates instructional materials that have been submitted by publishers and makes recommendations to adopt or reject each submission; (4) recommends policies and activities to the SBE, the California Department of Education(CDE), and local education agencies regarding curriculum and instruction; and (5) advises and makes recommendations to the SBE on implementing the state’s academic content standards. (The SBE also typically appoints separate committees to assist the IQC in developing curriculum frameworks, developing evaluation criteria for instructional materials, and reviewing instructional materials.)
The IQC holds four two-day meetings a year. Additional IQC and Subject Matter Committee meetings may also be scheduled if needed. All of these meetings require preparation time for IQC members. IQC members may be called upon to make an additional commitment of 10-12 days to participate in the review of instructional materials submitted for adoption in California.
Term of Office
Terms are for four calendar years, and may be renewed by the SBE based upon participation and contribution, membership composition, a need to stagger terms, or other considerations. Additional information about the IQC may be found at http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/cc/cd/.
Travel, Lodging, and Other Expenses
IQC members serve without pay and are reimbursed for authorized travel costs according to established SBE procedures. Members will be reimbursed for travel and per diem expenses related to IQC meetings only. No reimbursement is made for other activities.
The application form may be found on the SBE’s Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/cc/ab/.
Please note that the application form requests that applicants provide both a resume and two letters of recommendation. The SBE also requests that applicants provide a detailed explanation of interest in and qualifications to serve on the IQC.
All applications and corresponding materials must be received in the CDE by 5:00 p.m. on Friday, November 15, 2013, in order to be considered for appointment. Incomplete applications will not be considered. All applications and corresponding materials for appointment to the IQC should be sent to:
Thomas Adams, Executive Director, Instructional Quality Commission
Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division
California Department of Education
1430 N Street, Suite 3207
Sacramento, CA 95814
Final candidates must be available for telephone interviews with the SBE Screening Committee on December 16 and/or December 17, 2013. Telephone interview times will be announced at a later date.
For questions or additional information regarding the IQC, contact Thomas Adams at 916 319-0881.
California State Board of Education Approves Suspension of State’s Accountability Measurement System
Posted: Wednesday, March 11th, 2015
SACRAMENTO— State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson today announced that the State Board of Education voted unanimously to suspend the Academic Performance Index (API) for the 2014-15 school year Learn More…
Posted: Tuesday, March 3rd, 2015
by Peter A’Hearn
I am really enjoying the creativity that NGSS is awakening in teachers. Those who want to create are taking the standards (and the freedom that comes from the lack of a test) and really exploring what engages their students. I found though, that even when trying our best to match up to the expectations of NGSS, there is a feeling that we missed something. Did we remember the crosscutting concepts? Did the students engage in the practices at the level that NGSS expects? Did we get to the engineering? How about the Nature of Science? Was the content deep enough to really teach the DCI to the point where it could be applied to a new situation? Was it engaging? About a real world phenomenon or problem? Learn More…
Posted: Tuesday, March 3rd, 2015
by Jill Grace
I’ve learned the hard way that I will get “huffs”, eye-rolls, grunts, and the occasional nuclear meltdown from students if I ask them to summarize their learning in, dare I say it, a paragraph. It’s as though paragraph is a bad word and how shocking that I would ask for one in science class! I even get slammed with questions: “How many sentences to I have to write?” (why are we still asking that question in middle school?), “Do I have to use complete sentences?”, and “Do I really have to write a whole paragraph?” *teacher sigh*
First and foremost, I am a huge advocate of having students produce writing in a science class. I will also admit that this can be a challenge, and so the year that I decided to make the shift to an interactive science notebook it was glaring at me. I would be asking students for writing as a vehicle to share their thinking (in what we refer to as “outputs” in the notebook) all the time. Although we wouldn’t be able to avoid the writing, sometimes I may want to ask my students to share their thinking in a way that will avoid the drama that asking for a paragraph can sometimes generate. (Incidentally, this was all prior to implementation of the Common Core Standards – where anecdotally, in just one year, I’ve seen a big shift in student acceptance of writing outside of language arts.) Learn More…
Posted: Tuesday, March 3rd, 2015
The California State Board of Education will vote on the Public School Accountability Act (PSAA) Committee’s recommendation to suspend the calculation of the Academic Performance Index (API) for a second year Learn More…