July 2014 California State Board of Education Recap – the Science Education Highlights
Posted: Tuesday, August 5th, 2014
by Jessica L. Sawko
On July 9 – 10, 2014, the California State Board of Education (SBE) held its regularly scheduled meeting. There were several topics on the agenda that were of interest to science educators and science education and CSTA attended both days to address those items.
New Science Assessment Development
Item 5 on the board’s agenda was the extension of the California Department of Education’s (CDE) contract with testing contractor Educational Testing Service (ETS). This contract extension includes many tasks for ETS including the administration of the science CSTs in the spring of 2015 and tasks for the development of new assessments in science aligned to the California Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Per the agreement ETS will assist CDE and the State Superintendent of Public Instruction (SSPI) in developing a recommendations report for new science assessment for consideration by the SBE. The report will include recommendations for the following areas:
- Grade level, content, and type of assessment
- Use of Consortium-developed assessments and various item types
- Use of various assessment options, including, but not necessarily limited to, computer-based tests, locally scored performance tasks, and portfolios
- Use of matrix sampling, if appropriate, and the use of population sampling
- Timeline for test development, field testing, and operational implementation
- Cost estimates for content areas, as appropriate
As a part of the scope of work, ETS will develop blueprints and item specifications for NGSS-based science assessments to meet federal requirement, both standard and alternate assessments. In addition, after approval of those documents, ETS will develop items for the federally required assessments.
CSTA made public comments with concerns about the seemingly limiting language (in terms of item type development) in the scope of work document, especially in advance of the science assessment stakeholder meetings which had not yet taken place. In addition, CSTA recommended that the contract be amended to include that ETS build from the work, guidance, and information provided in the NRC Report, Developing Assessments for the Next Generation Science Standards that was published earlier this year, in addition to the NAEP and ETS’s previous experience with the computer-based pilot science assessment they conducted in 2012.
The SBE unanimously approved the ELA/ELD Curriculum Framework. The document, still requiring a number of finishing touches, is the first of its kind and is approximately 1,200 pages long. The framework provides support and guidance to teachers, parents, administrators, and instructional material providers on how to teach both the California Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects (CA CCSS for ELA/Literacy) and the California English Language Development Standards (CA ELD Standards). As stated in the Introduction to the framework (May-June 2014 draft, page 2, retrieved July 28, 2014):
This framework focuses on the teaching and learning of English literacy and language, which includes instruction in reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language and the use and development of these skills across the disciplines… It includes guidance for the design of instructional materials, curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional learning with the purpose of ensuring that the range of California’s learners benefit optimally and achieve their highest potentials.
CSTA and its members played an active role in reviewing, editing, and providing input during the writing process. CSTA conducted a document wide review of the first public draft, and focused its review of the second public draft on the science snapshots and vignettes included in the document, which portray the science teacher’s role in supporting the Common Core ELA and California ELD standards.
CSTA and other organizations made public comment requesting the removal of certain language for instructional materials regarding specifications for decodable text. Alas, this effort was not successful; however, the language that was adopted by the SBE had previously been modified during the ELA/ELD Subject Matter Committee meeting in late June. The final language adopted represented a compromise.
The ELA/ELD Framework provides chapters providing an overview of the standards, key considerations, grade level chapters for TK-1; 2-3; 4-5; 6-8; and 9-12, assessment, equity and access, learning in the 21st century, professional learning, instructional materials, resources, a glossary, and an appendix with a list of book resources for teachers.
NGSS Curriculum Framework
On day two of the State Board’s meeting, they approved the Curriculum Framework and Evaluation Criteria Committee Guidelines and the appointment of the members to the Curriculum Framework and Evaluation Criteria Committee (CFCC). The CFCC will play a significant role in the revision of the Science Framework for California Public Schools, Kindergarten Through Grade Twelve (Science Curriculum Framework). The Science Curriculum Framework will be revised to incorporate and support the Next Generation Science Standards for California Public Schools, Kindergarten through Grade Twelve (CA NGSS), adopted by the SBE in September 2013, and to reflect current research in science instruction. The CFCC provides input into the initial draft of the revised framework in accordance with guidelines approved by the SBE.
CSTA applauds the 171 educators who applied to serve on this time intensive committee. Our congratulations to all 20 appointees, most especially the following members of CSTA:
- Robert Sherriff (CFCC co-chair)
- Juanita Chan
- John Galisky
- Susan Gomez-Zwiep
- Nicole Hawke
- Lisa Hegdahl
- Stephanie Pechan
- Anthony Quan
- Jo Topps
- David Tupper
- Jeanine Wulfenstein
The next step in the Science Curriculum Framework development process will be meetings of the CFCC to review and provide input to the Framework writers. The meetings of the CFCC will take place in Sacramento at the California Department of Education (1430 N Street, Sacramento, CA)
September 9–10, 2014
November 5–6, 2014*
February 26–27, 2015
If you would like to provide input but are not able to attend a meeting in person, you may send your comments via email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
*The November CFCC meeting will take place at the State Library located at 900 N Street, Sacramento, CA.
Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) Template
The final item that CSTA addressed at the July SBE meeting was CSTA’s recommendation for changes to the LCAP template language. CSTA recommended that the language on the template to provide guidance for districts when addressing Priority #2 be modified to make it clearer for districts that the priority address all standards, not simply the Common Core and ELD standards. See our call to action last month for more information.
Several dozen speakers addressed the SBE on the issue of the LCAP template. Only CSTA and one other organization addressed the board requesting greater emphasis for science in the LCAP template.
The next regular meeting of the State Board of Education will be September 3 – 4, 2014. If you would like to receive email notices when the State Board posts their agenda items, you can join their email list at http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/ag/ag/sbefullagendamail.asp
Posted: Monday, November 21st, 2016
CSTA is pleased to announce that we are now accepting proposals for 90-minute workshops and three- and six-hour short courses for the 2017 California Science Education Conference. Workshops and short courses make up the bulk of the content and professional learning opportunities available at the conference. In recognition of their contribution, members who present a workshop or short course receive 50% off of their registration fees. For more information regarding proposals, and to submit one today, follow the links below.
Short Course Proposal Deadline: February 6, 2017
Posted: Friday, November 18th, 2016
Do you want to have a voice in health education in California public schools? Consider applying to serve on the Health Education Curriculum Framework and Evaluation Criteria Committee (CFCC), which will work closely with the framework writing team to create a new framework for health education. The new framework will be based on the state-adopted health education content standards and reflect both current research and new state laws.
Applicants must be submitted by 3 p.m. on December 15, 2016. More information about the Health Education Framework revision and the CFCC application is available on the CDE Health Education Curriculum Frameworks Web page at: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/he/cf/. Learn More…
Posted: Thursday, November 17th, 2016
by Jessica Sawko
Last month, more than 2,100 science educators convened at the Palm Springs Convention Center for three days of professional learning and networking. The halls buzzed with excitement, the exhibit hall traffic ebbed and flowed like the tides of an ocean, and workshop rooms often filled to capacity with standing room only. CSTA thanks the many volunteers, presenters, exhibitors, and sponsors who helped make this year’s conference a success.
Two of the most popular presentations at the conference included presentations on the new Science Curriculum Framework (which ended up being presented twice due to an error in printing in the program book!) and the Science Assessment Update workshop presented by CDE and ETS. Handouts for both of these presentations are available via the conference app. Learn More…
Posted: Wednesday, November 16th, 2016
by Marian Murphy-Shaw
As a county office Educational Services Director I get to work with many districts, teachers and site leaders on a variety topics, including science. I have the good fortune to be embarking on a new project as part of a team formed by the California State University, Chico – Project ESTEEM.
CSU Chico recruited teams of elementary teachers and their principals to participate in Project ESTEEM, Elementary Science Teachers, Educating, Elevating, and Meliorating; a two-year professional learning grant secured last winter by the University. Learn More…
Posted: Wednesday, November 16th, 2016
by Karal S. Blankenship and Claudia Mitchell
Science in Kindergarten is no different than teaching science in other grades. Students come to us full of wonder, resulting in endless questions. We strive to provide opportunities for our students to become active listeners, use critical thinking skills, to observe, and to make sense of the work around them. This provides our students the chance to develop a deep appreciation for science. This is nuts and bolts of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Learn More…