March/April 2017 – Vol. 29 No. 6

Legislation and Science Learning in California: What’s going on?

Posted: Thursday, August 1st, 2013

by Marian Murphy-Shaw

The simple answer to the title question: a lot! In fact in conversations with colleagues about the future of California science education, the phrase “a perfect storm” has come up more than once. Depending on the time you’ve budgeted to tune in to policy and legislation activities you may be feeling the full force of the tempest, getting a little wind and drizzle out on the fringes, or sitting in the eye of the storm thinking all is calm.

As a long-standing institution supporting quality science education and the teachers who provide it, CSTA utilizes a number of methods to remain an ever-present voice regarding state educational policy and legislation.  For example, we often use CSTA’s policy and position papers when we attend public forums in order to inform parents, colleagues or local board members. These position/policy statements are intended to articulate what CSTA advocates for on behalf of each of you – our members and all the science educators of California. If you are not familiar with these, you might take a moment to see what is on the Policy and Position Statements webpage: http://www.cascience.org/csta/aboutPosition.asp.

That said, the versions you see there now will be changing soon – that perfect storm, as noted in last month’s CCS by past-president Rick Pomeroy, is stirring up just about everything related to science education

CSTA continues to advocate for improved, up-to-date and instructionally effective standards, curriculum and instruction – and the NGSS, along with Common Core State Standards, have arrived. The need for public and procedural review as advocated by CSTA remains ongoing, which is why CSTA has made the state NGSS review process available to you from the first draft last year through last month’s State Board of Education materials. For California, the next steps will be the development of frameworks and curriculum assuming full adoption of NGSS this fall. CSTA is tracking legislation related to these topics to ensure the voice of science educators is part of the process.

Additional policy and position statements by CSTA address assessment, accountability, teacher recruitment, teacher preparation, and ongoing professional learning – all of which are also changing rapidly. Your CSTA board and staff members use these to guide our efforts in support or opposition to proposed legislation as appropriate. Below are few specific bills we’re following, and you might also like to follow by going to the California legislative Information: Bill Search site at https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billSearchClient.xhtml.

What else can you do?

  • Follow the link to the NGSS document that’s been recommended to the California State Department of Education and read over the content and the instructionally effective design of the learning progressions, as well the national K-12 Framework for Science Education.
  • Become involved in the science framework and curriculum work when the state begins their development.
  • Help us increase CSTA membership  – join or encourage a colleague to join so when CSTA speaks at meetings we are able to represent a majority of teachers in the state as members  – at present that is not case.
  • Contact your CSTA Regional Director to share your perspective or to request more information about NGSS.

In the meantime know that CSTA continues to represent quality science education and you.

 

Bill/Author:  SB 300/Hancock 

CSTA Status:  CSTA Support

Summary:  Waiting for Appropriations Committee action, has passed other committees with near unanimous support. Existing law prohibits the State Board of Education from adopting instructional materials until the 2015–2016 school year. This bill would require the state board to consider the adoption of a revised curriculum framework and evaluation criteria for instructional materials in science on or before November 30, 2015, and would require the revised curriculum framework to be based on specified science content standards (the new CA science standards – pending action by the State Board of Education).

Bill/Author:  AB 484/Bonilla

CSTA Status:  CSTA watch list

Summary:  Currently approved by the Education Committee and moved on to Appropriations. Set for hearing on August 12, 2013. This bill, commencing with the 2013–14 school year, the administration of assessments required as part of the STAR Program would be suspended, except for those assessments in the core subjects necessary to satisfy the adequate yearly progress requirements of the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 in grades 3 to 8, inclusive, and grade 10, and those assessments augmented for use as part of the Early Assessment Program in grade 11, until new assessments addressing the common core state standards are developed and implemented. The suspension includes the suspension of End of Course exams in science at the high school level (these exams will be available to districts, at their own expense, through 2014/2015). The bill would establish the California Measurement of Academic Performance and Progress for the 21st Century (CalMAPP21), which would succeed the STAR Program, and specify procedures and policies for CalMAPP21.The bill also calls for Superintendent, in consultation with science teachers and other stakeholders, to develop a recommendation for science assessments to satisfy federal requirements, to be presented to the State Board within six months of the adoption of new standards. The recommendation is to include a plan to begin assessment in the 2016/2017 school year. The bill calls for the Superintendent to develop a plan for assessing non-federally required tests (including science assessment outside those referenced above) by August 2015.

Bill/Author:  SB 247/ Liu

CSTA Status:  CSTA watch list

Summary:  Currently approved by Education Committee and moved on to Appropriations. This bill, commencing July 1, 2014, would exclude pupils in grade 2 from the STAR, or any new state testing, process. The bill would require the State Department of Education, by November 1, 2014, to identify and make available to school districts information regarding existing assessments in language arts and mathematics aligned to the adopted common core academic content standards for pupils in grade 2 for diagnostic use by classroom teachers. The bill would require the savings realized from the elimination of the grade 2 standards-based achievement testing to be used by local educational agencies to administer the identified assessments.

Bill/Author:  AB 899/Weber

CSTA Status:  CSTA watch list, considering support if moved further

Summary:  English language development standards: English learners. This bill would require the Superintendent, on or before January 1, 2015, to recommend modifications to the English language development standards to align with the state board-approved academic content standards for mathematics, and would also require the Superintendent to recommend modifications to the English language development standards to align with the state board-approved science content standards, for adoption to the state board. This bill would require that funding be provided in the annual Budget Act or another statute before these provisions could be implemented. The bill would make its provisions inoperative on July 1, 2016.

Written by Marian Murphy-Shaw

Marian Murphy-Shaw

Marian Murphy-Shaw is the student services director at Siskiyou County Office of Education and is CSTA’s Region 1 Director and chair of CSTA’s Policy Committee.

Leave a Reply

LATEST POST

California Science Curriculum Framework Now Available

Posted: Tuesday, March 14th, 2017

The pre-publication version of the new California Science Curriculum Framework is now available for download. This publication incorporates all the edits that were approved by the State Board of Education in November 2016 and was many months in the making. Our sincere thanks to the dozens of CSTA members were involved in its development. Our appreciation is also extended to the California Department of Education, the State Board of Education, the Instructional Quality Commission, and the Science Curriculum Framework and Evaluation Criteria Committee and their staff for their hard work and dedication to produce this document and for their commitment to the public input process. To the many writers and contributors to the Framework CSTA thanks you for your many hours of work to produce a world-class document.

For tips on how to approach this document see our article from December 2016: California Has Adopted a New Science Curriculum Framework – Now What …? If you would like to learn more about the Framework, consider participating in one of the Framework Launch events (a.k.a. Rollout #4) scheduled throughout 2017.

The final publication version (formatted for printing) will be available in July 2017. This document will not be available in printed format, only electronically.

Written by California Science Teachers Association

California Science Teachers Association

CSTA represents science educators statewide—in every science discipline at every grade level, Kindergarten through University.

Call for CSTA Awards Nominations

Posted: Monday, March 13th, 2017

The 2017 Award Season is now open! One of the benefits of being a CSTA member is your eligibility for awards as well as your eligibility to nominate someone for an award. CSTA offers several awards and members may nominate individuals and organizations for the Future Science Teacher Award, the prestigious Margaret Nicholson Distinguished Service Award, and the CSTA Distinguished Contributions Award (organizational award). May 9, 2017 is the deadline for nominations for these awards. CSTA believes that the importance of science education cannot be overstated. Given the essential presence of the sciences in understanding the past and planning for the future, science education remains, and will increasingly be one of the most important disciplines in education. CSTA is committed to recognizing and encouraging excellence in science teaching through the presentation of awards to science educators and organizations who have made outstanding contributions in science education in the state and who are poised to continue the momentum of providing high quality, relevant science education into the future. Learn More…

Written by California Science Teachers Association

California Science Teachers Association

CSTA represents science educators statewide—in every science discipline at every grade level, Kindergarten through University.

Call for Volunteers – CSTA Committees

Posted: Monday, March 13th, 2017

Volunteer

CSTA is now accepting applications from regular, preservice, and retired members to serve on our volunteer committees! CSTA’s all-volunteer board of directors invites you to consider maximizing your member experience by volunteering for CSTA. CSTA committee service offers you the opportunity to share your expertise, learn a new skill, or do something you love to do but never have the opportunity to do in your regular day. CSTA committee volunteers do some pretty amazing things: Learn More…

Written by California Science Teachers Association

California Science Teachers Association

CSTA represents science educators statewide—in every science discipline at every grade level, Kindergarten through University.

A Friend in CA Science Education Now at CSTA Region 1 Science Center

Posted: Monday, March 13th, 2017

by Marian Murphy-Shaw

If you attended an NGSS Rollout phase 1-3 or CDE workshops at CSTA’s annual conference you may recall hearing from Chris Breazeale when he was working with the CDE. Chris has relocated professionally, with his passion for science education, and is now the Executive Director at the Explorit Science Center, a hands-on exploration museum featuring interactive STEM exhibits located at the beautiful Mace Ranch, 3141 5th St. in Davis, CA. Visitors can “think it, try it, and explorit” with a variety of displays that allow visitors to “do science.” To preview the museum, or schedule a classroom visit, see www.explorit.org. Learn More…

Written by Marian Murphy-Shaw

Marian Murphy-Shaw

Marian Murphy-Shaw is the student services director at Siskiyou County Office of Education and is CSTA’s Region 1 Director and chair of CSTA’s Policy Committee.

Learning to Teach in 3D

Posted: Monday, March 13th, 2017

by Joseph Calmer

Probably like you, NGSS has been at the forefront of many department meetings, lunch conversations, and solitary lesson planning sessions. Despite reading the original NRC Framework, the Ca Draft Frameworks, and many CSTA writings, I am still left with the question: “what does it actually mean for my classroom?”

I had an eye-opening experience that helped me with that question. It came out of a conversation that I had with a student teacher. It turns out that I’ve found the secret to learning how to teach with NGSS: I need to engage in dialogue about teaching with novice teachers. I’ve had the pleasure of teaching science in some capacity for 12 years. During that time pedagogy and student learning become sort of a “hidden curriculum.” It is difficult to plan a lesson for the hidden curriculum; the best way is to just have two or more professionals talk and see what emerges. I was surprised it took me so long to realize this epiphany. Learn More…

Written by Guest Contributor

From time to time CSTA receives contributions from guest contributors. The opinions and views expressed by these contributors are not necessarily those of CSTA. By publishing these articles CSTA does not make any endorsements or statements of support of the author or their contribution, either explicit or implicit. All links to outside sources are subject to CSTA’s Disclaimer Policy: http://www.classroomscience.org/disclaimer.