September/October 2017 – Vol. 30 No. 1

Liquids, Solids, and Water Lab

Posted: Saturday, January 1st, 2011

Name __________________

Date ___________________

Partners’ Names _________

by Jeff Bradbury and Patricia Buchanan

Question: Water is unique in that it is the only natural substance that is found in all three states: liquid, solid (ice), and gas (steam).  What are the molecular differences between each of the states?

Purpose:  To develop a theory that explains why liquids and solids behave the way they do.

Unique Properties of water:

Less dense as a solid
Liquid at room temperature
High surface tension
High heat capacity
Universal solvent

Other properties of liquids:

Cohesion
Diffusion
Adhesion
Viscosity

Procedure and Observations and Data:

1. In this lab you will work in groups of three.  Go to each station (not necessarily in order) and follow the directions in the procedure.  Make sure you go to all stations.

2. Record your observations and give a brief explanation for each of the stations.

3. Draw a diagram (model) for stations 2, 5, and 6 showing the molecular level of what the particles are doing.

Stations:

Station 1: Drops on a penny

Station 2: Boyle’s law apparatus noncompressibility of liquids

Station 3: Drops on a microslide

Station 4: Floating a paper clip on water

Station 5: Food coloring in hot and cold water

Station 6: Marbles in different liquids

Station 7: Dragging drops

Station 8: Observing crystals

*Make sure to return each station to its original condition when your group is finished.

Part 1 Stations:

Station 1: Drops on a penny

Materials:  Beaker of de-ionized water, a beaker of soapy water, place droppers in each, and two pennies.

Procedure:  Put as many drops of water and soapy water on two different pennies.

Observations:

How many drops of pure water fit onto the penny?________

How many drops of soapy water fit onto the penny?________

Explain the difference

What property(s) of liquids is demonstrated here?  How?

Station 2: Boyle’s law apparatus noncompressibility of liquids

Materials:  Two Boyle’s Law apparatus, (syringes) one with water and one with water and air.

Procedure:  Try pressing on the two blocks (don’t press too hard).

Observations:

What is the difference between the two?

What causes the difference between the two?

What property(s) of liquids is demonstrated here?  How?

Black box diagram of liquids in syringe

Station 3: Drops on a microslide

Materials:  Six microslides, two droppers, a beaker of water, and a beaker of soapy water.

Procedure:

Put two dry microslides together and then pull them apart.

Put a drop of water on two slides. Place them together and then pull them apart.

Put a drop of soapy water on two slides place them together and then pull them apart.

Observations:

What was it like pulling the three different pairs of microslides apart?

Explain the difference.

What property(s) of liquids is demonstrated here?  How?

Station 4: Floating a paper clip on water

Materials:  Two 600 ml beakers, one with de-ionized water and one with soapy water, four paper clips.

Procedure:  Using one of the bent paperclips try to make another paper clip float on the surface of the water in the beaker.

Observations:

Was it easier to float the paperclip in one of the beakers?  Explain why.

What property(s) of liquids is demonstrated here?  How?

Station 5: Food coloring in hot and cold water

Materials:  Hot plate, beaker tongs, two 1000ml beakers, ice, two 250 ml beakers, food coloring.

Procedure:  Using the beaker tongs, pour some hot water from the beaker on the hot plate into one of the empty beakers.  Pour some of the ice water (without pouring any ice) into the other empty beaker.  Add one drop of food coloring to each of the beakers you poured water into.

Record your observations.

What property(s) of liquids is demonstrated here?  How?

Black Box diagram:

Food coloring in hot water Food coloring in cold water

Station 6: Marbles in three different liquids

Materials: Three marbles each in a labeled and sealed jar/bottle of water, alcohol, and glycerin.

Procedure:  Invert the three flasks and watch the marbles go to the bottom of each bottle.

Observations:

Did the marbles fall through the liquids at the same rate?  Explain

Draw three black box diagrams that show at the molecular level why the marbles fall at different rates in the different liquids:

Alcohol

Water Glycerin

What property(s) of liquids is demonstrated here?  How?

Station 7: Dragging drops

Materials:  Two sheets of wax paper, two eyedroppers, beaker of de-ionized water and a beaker of soapy water.

Procedure:  Put drops of water from each beaker onto the separate pieces of wax paper.

(Do not contaminate the beakers by switching droppers.)

Try to drag the drops around with the dropper.

Observations:

How many drops of the soapy water could you drag?_________

How many drops of the de-ionized water could you drag?_______

What property(s) of liquids is demonstrated here?  How?

Station 8: Observing crystals

Materials:  Examples of several crystals, models of crystals

Make some observations about the crystals.

How are they different from each other?

What property(s) of liquids is demonstrated here?  How?

Look at the models of the crystals.  What do you observe?  What is the major difference between liquids and solids?

Draw a black box diagram that shows the difference between gases, solids, and liquids.

Gases Solids Liquids

Conclusions and Reflections:

What properties of liquids are different from gases?

What causes this difference?

What properties of solids are different from liquids?

What causes this difference?

Jeff Bradbury is a professor of chemistry at Cerritos College in Norwalk and is community college director for CSTA; Patricia Buchanan is the Cal Grip Grant Project Assistant at Cerritos College.  The original idea for this activity came from the Los Angeles County Office of Education 15 years ago, which the authors modified.

Written by California Science Teachers Association

California Science Teachers Association

CSTA represents science educators statewide—in every science discipline at every grade level, Kindergarten through University.

Leave a Reply

LATEST POST

State Schools Chief Tom Torlakson Announces 2017 Finalists for Presidential Awards for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching

Posted: Wednesday, September 20th, 2017

SACRAMENTO—State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson today nominated eight exceptional secondary mathematics and science teachers as California finalists for the 2017 Presidential Awards for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching (PAEMST).

“These teachers are dedicated and accomplished individuals whose innovative teaching styles prepare our students for 21st century careers and college and develop them into the designers and inventors of the future,” Torlakson said. “They rank among the finest in their profession and also serve as wonderful mentors and role models.”

The California Department of Education (CDE) partners annually with the California Science Teachers Association and the California Mathematics Council to recruit and select nominees for the PAEMST program—the highest recognition in the nation for a mathematics or science teacher. The Science Finalists will be recognized at the CSTA Awards Luncheon on Saturday, October 14, 2017. Learn More…

Written by California Science Teachers Association

California Science Teachers Association

CSTA represents science educators statewide—in every science discipline at every grade level, Kindergarten through University.

Thriving in a Time of Change

Posted: Wednesday, September 13th, 2017

by Jill Grace

By the time this message is posted online, most schools across California will have been in session for at least a month (if not longer, and hat tip to that bunch!). Long enough to get a good sense of who the kids in your classroom are and to get into that groove and momentum of the daily flow of teaching. It’s also very likely that for many of you who weren’t a part of a large grant initiative or in a district that set wheels in motion sooner, this is the first year you will really try to shift instruction to align to the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). I’m not going to lie to you, it’s a challenging year – change is hard. Change is even harder when there’s not a playbook to go by.  But as someone who has had the very great privilege of walking alongside teachers going through that change for the past two years and being able to glimpse at what this looks like for different demographics across that state, there are three things I hope you will hold on to. These are things I have come to learn will overshadow the challenge: a growth mindset will get you far, one is a very powerful number, and it’s about the kids. Learn More…

Powered By DT Author Box

Written by Jill Grace

Jill Grace

Jill Grace is a Regional Director for the K-12 Alliance and is President of CSTA.

If You Are Not Teaching Science Then You Are Not Teaching Common Core

Posted: Thursday, August 31st, 2017

by Peter A’Hearn 

“Science and Social Studies can be taught for the last half hour of the day on Fridays”

– Elementary school principal

Anyone concerned with the teaching of science in elementary school is keenly aware of the problem of time. Kids need to learn to read, and learning to read takes time, nobody disputes that. So Common Core ELA can seem like the enemy of science. This was a big concern to me as I started looking at the curriculum that my district had adopted for Common Core ELA. I’ve been through those years where teachers are learning a new curriculum, and know first-hand how a new curriculum can become the focus of attention- sucking all the air out of the room. Learn More…

Powered By DT Author Box

Written by Peter AHearn

Peter AHearn

Peter A’Hearn is the Region 4 Director for CSTA.

Tools for Creating NGSS Standards Based Lessons

Posted: Tuesday, August 29th, 2017

by Elizabeth Cooke

Think back on your own experiences with learning science in school. Were you required to memorize disjointed facts without understanding the concepts?

Science Education Background

In the past, science education focused on rote memorization and learning disjointed ideas. Elementary and secondary students in today’s science classes are fortunate now that science instruction has shifted from students demonstrating what they know to students demonstrating how they are able to apply their knowledge. Science education that reflects the Next Generation Science Standards challenges students to conduct investigations. As students explore phenomena and discrepant events they engage in academic discourse guided by focus questions from their teachers or student generated questions of that arise from analyzing data and creating and revising models that explain natural phenomena. Learn More…

Written by Elizabeth Cooke

Elizabeth Cooke

Elizabeth Cooke teaches TK-5 science at Markham Elementary in the Oakland Unified School District, is an NGSS Early Implementer, and is CSTA’s Secretary.

News and Happenings in CSTA’s Region 1 – Fall 2017

Posted: Tuesday, August 29th, 2017

by Marian Murphy-Shaw

Cal

This month I was fortunate enough to hear about some new topics to share with our entire region. Some of you may access the online or newsletter options, others may attend events in person that are nearer to you. Long time CSTA member and environmental science educator Mike Roa is well known to North Bay Area teachers for his volunteer work sharing events and resources. In this month’s Region 1 updates I am happy to make a few of the options Mike offers available to our region. Learn More…

Written by Marian Murphy-Shaw

Marian Murphy-Shaw

Marian Murphy-Shaw is the student services director at Siskiyou County Office of Education and is CSTA’s Region 1 Director and chair of CSTA’s Policy Committee.