Ocean’s Music: Climate’s Dance
Posted: Tuesday, May 6th, 2014
By Jill Grace
As a teacher beginning to explore how to move ahead with the Next Generation Science Standards, I’ve been challenging myself to see how I can transform some of my current content. For example, I’ve recently been teaching my 7th graders about how geology and climate drive biology (to support the 1998 California standard, 7.4.d). Previously as 6th graders, they explored concepts related to heat distribution in the oceans and atmosphere (6.4.d and 6.4.e). When I tease out just the climate piece of my instruction, and consider the relationship between ocean and climate, it’s easy to see how rich the topic is, that it easily supports many of the shifts called for in NGSS, and that the topic works well with either middle school progression of NGSS.
The theme of exploring the relationship between the ocean and climate is not only an important issue on a local and global scale, it also serves as a great vehicle to bundle core science ideas, crosscutting concepts, science and engineering practices, and nature of science themes. There are also easy connections to Common Core standards, as the exploration of the topic requires students to work with rich text, determine central ideas, evaluate claims, and analyze data, among other skills. For this article, I’ll share some of my favorite resources that have helped me wrap my head around climate change. In some cases, I even use the resources directly with my middle school students, as I’ve never felt that a standard classroom textbook has been enough to support this topic. Finally, I’ll share my efforts at playing with bundling the performance expectations of NGSS.
I’ll never forget the first time I saw this poster highlighting NASA’s Jet Propulsion Lab’s Jason-1 expedition, which began in 2001:
Jason-1 was launched after the successful 1992 Topex/Poseidon project, the first time we ever saw the large-scale ocean patterns that lead to El Niño and La Niña weather patterns. Both Jason-1 and Topex/Poseidon focused on measuring the changes in height of the sea surface, which could provide the scientific community information about ocean currents beyond what ships and buoys could. Although I have a degree in marine biology and of course understood there were relationships between the ocean and climate, I didn’t really think about it on such a profound level until I saw that phrase, “Ocean’s Music: Climate’s Dance”. Even then, though, the scientific community was just really scratching the surface of understanding the complexity of that relationship. In the thirteen years since I first saw this poster, the field, along with our knowledge, has exploded.
The very deep relationship between our oceans and climate is one of the most important scientific ideas we are charged with helping students understand. With about 71% of our planet covered in ocean, it is no wonder that the ocean has a profound impact on climate, and vice versa. There is also no question that this will be one of the greatest societal issues we will face in the coming decades. When I look to the future and imagine my students emerging into the world as adults raising their own families and voting on policy, I want them to understand the science behind that relationship. By focusing on what ocean research can tell us about climate, we can present our students with a window to understanding mechanisms, amplifiers of past climate change, and signals of current climate change.
Thinking about this topic and planning for NGSS, I am most intrigued by the changes in instruction that will come from having students work more with real time data and its role of modeling in science, which is used extensively in ocean-climate investigations. Thus, I challenged myself to introduce my students to a climate model, which help scientists understand and predict climate. More and more models today also explore the consequences of climate change and make the connections between recent global mean temperature increases and human activity. The model I chose to share with my students was published by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fourth Assessment report (126.96.36.199 Simulations of the 20th Century).
I was introduced to this model at a teacher institute hosted by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Lab last summer. It is used to test the hypothesis that modern global temperature trends are the result of natural forcings on climate (those not attributed to humans – anthropogenic forcings). I had a couple of my 7th grade classes this year work with figure 9.5:
Although it went over the heads of a few, most of them were able to make sense of it. They were really excited to see the trends following volcanic eruptions and were eager to hypothesize why we don’t see a separation between the modeled and observed trends in the second graph, and they hypothesized why there was a difference when anthropogenic forcings were removed from the model. We also had a rich conversation that led the class to hypothesize why we don’t see a separation in the modeled vs. observed trend (in the second graph) until around 1960. The kids were able to make the connection between the dramatic rise in the human population and that probably all the “baby boomers” born after World War II had grown up and now have their own homes, drive their own cars, etcetera.
All models make assumptions. Because of this, climate models, which are very complex and involve mathematical inferences of things like trends or statistical thresholds, are sometimes criticized because researchers have to make such mathematical assumptions. This, by the way, is normal in mathematics, statistics, and modeling in general, and why researchers disclose their assumptions and the limitations of their models. Besides computer modeling of climate change, we can also model aspects of climate change in a different but really clever way. Scientists can use direct observations of phenomena related to El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), and Arctic Oscillation (AO). These are the most common types of repetitive shifts in the ocean/atmosphere circulation. These direct observations can be used to create small-scale models, which can in turn be used to predict the effects of such climate shifts on a much larger scale (longer duration). These small models also provide scientists a window of understanding of the implications of climate change on living things (for example, which types of species thrive vs. those that seem to decline, what seems to trigger populations shifts, etc.). You can’t always get a clear understanding of this at large scale because it’s too large; there are so many confounding factors. It’s easier to take the small scale, wrap your head around it, and model it to “big”. Revisiting the topic of ENSO with my students in 7th grade helps them understand that we can predict the effects of changes in ocean temperature and its impact on climate. The Nature Education Knowledge Project offers a nice non-fiction reading source on this with links back to primary literature that can help both teachers and students explore the effects of such oscillations.
The topic of carbon, especially carbon dioxide, is unavoidable when exploring oceans and climate. Prior to our work on climate, I help my students explore the basics of carbon since they currently don’t formally receive that instruction until 8th grade. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration’s PMEL Carbon Program website is very informative and helped me refresh my own understanding. A few resources that my students have enjoyed are this carbon cycle activity and this series of carbon videos. Perplexed by information on past global CO2 levels, my students constant ask, “How do they know this?” so I also make attempts to connect them to active research in the field. My students especially like learning how scientists gather data on past CO2 concentrations in the ocean by using sediment cores. This video about the Lamont-Doherty Sediment Core Repository is one they have enjoyed. I’m looking forward to the scheduled July launch of a new NASA Satellite, the Orbital Carbon Observatory-2, also being developed by the Jet Propulsion Lab in Pasadena and which should provide even more information about CO2 as it will gather information about global geographic distributions of CO2 sources and sinks through sophisticated computer modeling. A carbon observatory from space will allow scientists to measure regions of the world currently too difficult to study. I will certainly be connecting my students with this mission!
Diving even deeper, students can make connections between the CO2 concentrations and living things. Studying the relationship between CO2 concentrations and ocean acidification and its subsequent impact on marine invertebrates can help students see the consequence of too much carbon in the global system. Once again, the Nature Education Project has a great synopsis of this, as does the Oceanus Magazine of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (I recommend the multimedia interactive on how animals build their shells).
There is so much more to explore. A gold mine of lesson plans related to climate can be found at the Climate Literacy & Awareness Network (CLEAN) website. The National Center for Science Education also recently adopted climate change as one of its core missions. Their website has many resources to support climate education in the classroom. Further, NASA has a tremendous amount of on-line content to support this. I particularly like the toolbar at the top of the page displaying the current data:
Exploring the connection between oceans and climate with your students is a great interdisciplinary way to make big-idea connections in content, have students work with modeling as a scientific practice, and has amazing potential to connect students to an active field of scientific research. Below is my attempt to show how this deep topic can be translated to NGSS. Hopefully this might inspire your future lesson planning.
- California Preferred Middle Grades Integrated Learning Progression Course
- California Alternative Middle Grades Discipline Specific Course
Special thanks to Dr. Mike Gunson, Scientist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, for help with this article.
Posted: Wednesday, October 12th, 2016
by Jessica Sawko
In June 2016 California submitted a waiver application to discontinue using the old CST (based on 1998 standards) and conduct two years of pilot and field tests (in spring 2017 and 2018, respectively) of the new science assessment designed to support our state’s current science standards (California Next Generation Science Standards (CA-NGSS) adopted in 2013). The waiver was requested because no student scores will be provided as a part of the pilot and field tests. The CDE received a response from the U.S. Department of Education (ED) on September 30, 2016, which provides the CDE the opportunity to resubmit a revised waiver request within 60 days. The CDE will be revising the waiver request and resubmitting as ED suggested.
At its October 2016 North/South Assessment meetings CDE confirmed that there will be no administration of the old CST in the spring of 2017. (An archive of the meeting is available at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/ai/infomeeting.asp.) Learn More…
Posted: Thursday, September 22nd, 2016
by Carol Peterson
1) To celebrate the 100th anniversary of the National Park Service, Google has put together a collection of virtual tours combining 360-degree video, panoramic photos and expert narration. It’s called “The Hidden Worlds of the National Parks” and is accessible right from the browser. You can choose from one of five different locales, including the Kenai Fjords in Alaska and Bryce Canyon in Utah, and get a guided “tour” from a local park ranger. Each one has a few virtual vistas to explore, with documentary-style voiceovers and extra media hidden behind clickable thumbnails. Ideas are included for use in classrooms. https://www.engadget.com/2016/08/25/google-offers-360-degree-tours-of-us-national-parks/. Learn More…
Posted: Thursday, September 22nd, 2016
CSTA is pleased to announce the winners of the 2016 CSTA Awards for Distinguished Contributions, Margaret Nicholson Distinguished Service Award, 2014 and 2015 PAEMST-Science recipients from California, and the 2016 California PAEMST Finalists. The following individuals and organizations will be honored during the 2016 California Science Education Conference on October 21- 23 in Palm Springs. This year’s group of awardees are truly outstanding. Please join us in congratulating them!
Margaret Nicholson Distinguished Service Award
The Margaret Nicholson Distinguished Service Award honors an individual who has made a significant contribution to science education in the state and who, through years of leadership and service, has truly made a positive impact on the quality of science teaching. This year’s recipient is John Keller, Ph.D. Dr. Keller is Associate Professor, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo and Co-Director, Center for Engineering, Science, and Mathematics Education, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. In her letter of recommendation, SDSU science education faculty and former CSTA board member Donna Ross wrote: “He brings people together who share the desire to make a difference in the development and implementation of programs for science teaching. Examples of these projects include the Math and Science Teaching Initiative (MSTI), Noyce Scholars Program, Western Regional Noyce Initiative, and the Science Teacher and Researcher (STAR) program.” Through his work, he has had a dramatic impact on science teacher education, both preservice and in-service, in California, the region, and the country. He developed and implemented the STEM Teacher and Researcher Program which aims to produce excellent K-12 STEM teachers by providing aspiring teachers with opportunities to do authentic research while helping them translate their research experience into classroom practice. SFSU faculty member Larry Horvath said it best in his letter:“John Keller exemplifies the best aspects of a scientist, science educator, and mentor. His contributions to science education in the state of California are varied, significant, and I am sure will continue well into the future.” Learn More…
Posted: Tuesday, September 20th, 2016
by Peter A’hearn
NGSS is a big shift. Teachers need to learn new content, figure out how this whole engineering thing relates to science, and develop new unit and lesson plans. How could NGSS possibly make life easier?
The idea that NGSS could make our lives easier came to me during the California State NGSS Rollout #1 Classroom Example lesson on chromatography. I have since done this lesson with high school chemistry students and it made me think back to having my own students do chromatography. I spent lots of time preparing to make sure the experiment went well and achieved the “correct” result. I pre-prepared the solutions and organized and prepped the materials. I re-wrote and re-wrote again the procedure so there was no way a kid could get it wrong. I spent 20 minutes before the lab modeling all of the steps in class, so there was no way to do it wrong. Except that it turns out there were many. Learn More…
Posted: Tuesday, September 20th, 2016
by Robert C. Victor. Twilight sky maps by Robert D. Miller. Graph of evening planet setting times by Dr. Jeffrey L. Hunt
Our evening twilight chart for September, depicting the sky about 40 minutes after sunset from SoCal, shows brilliant Venus remaining low, creeping from W to WSW and gaining a little altitude as the month progresses. Its close encounter within 2.5° N of Spica on Sept. 18 is best seen with binoculars to catch the star low in bright twilight. The brightest stars in the evening sky are golden Arcturus descending in the west, and blue-white Vega passing just north of overhead. Look for Altair and Deneb completing the Summer Triangle with Vega. The triangle of Mars-Saturn-Antares expands as Mars seems to hold nearly stationary in SSW as the month progresses, while Saturn and Antares slink off to the SW. Learn More…