March/April 2017 – Vol. 29 No. 6

The California 4-H Science, Engineering, and Technology (SET) Initiative: Using and Informing Best Practices for Science Education in Non-formal Settings

Posted: Tuesday, January 7th, 2014

by Steven Worker, Martin Smith, Andrea Ambrose, and Lynn Schmitt-McQuitty

4-H is the nation’s largest non-formal youth education program. As part of the land-grant university system, 4-H reaches over six million youth annually through science, healthy living, and civic engagement programs. In 2008, 4-H introduced the 4-H Science Mission Mandate to strengthen non-formal science education targeting improved scientific literacy among U.S. youth. This national effort provides strategic direction to state 4-H programs for science programming grounded in a positive youth development framework and utilizing experiential education and inquiry-based learning.

In California, 4-H established the 4-H Science, Engineering, and Technology (SET) Initiative to strengthen efforts around curriculum development, professional development, and research and evaluation.These anchor points are framed around the four essential components of scientific literacy: relevant science content, scientific reasoning abilities, interest and attitudes toward science, and authentic contributions through applied participation.

The principal goal of the California 4-H SET Initiative is to improve youth scientific literacy through effective programming while advancing the research base of non-formal youth science education. To accomplish this, 4-H academic and program staff have identified the need for systematic approaches to the development of programs, professional preparation, curriculum and applied research. Specifically, the California 4-H SET Initiative is focused on the use of strategies to develop, implement, and evaluate curriculum materials and professional development models for adult and teen volunteer educators.

Curriculum Development

The California 4-H approach to curriculum development emphasizes the design and evaluation of needs-based curricula. Curriculum content focuses on environmental, social, and economic issues germane to citizens of California and put forth as strategic initiatives for research and extension by the University of California’s Division of Natural Resources (UC ANR Strategic Vision 2025). Curriculum goals include understanding relevant science content, development of scientific reasoning skills, interest in science, and applied participation in communities.

4-H curricula are designed around the five-step experiential education model (Enfield, Schmitt-McQuitty, & Smith, 2007). Experiential education promotes deep understanding of concepts and application of new knowledge and skills to authentic settings. 4-H curriculum materials accomplish this by engaging youth in community-based service learning projects. Additionally, 4-H curricula promote positive youth development (PYD), an approach to youth programming that encourages long-term life outcomes in young people by fostering caring relationships with peers and adults, healthy behaviors, and leadership development (Campbell et al., 2013; Lerner et al., 2011).

One example of a 4-H curriculum development project that embodies this strategy is Bio-Security in 4-H Animal Science (Smith et al., 2011). Cooperative Extension staff, in collaboration with veterinarians and classroom teachers, developed and tested the curriculum. Subject matter content includes modes of disease transmission, risk assessment, and risk mitigation; activities also provide opportunities for youth to apply new knowledge and skills directly to raising their 4-H project animals. The curriculum evaluation focused on perceived changes in youths’ content knowledge. Outcomes revealed significant (p < .05) improvements in youths’ understanding of science concepts related to bio-security.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Professional Development

While the development and dissemination of high quality educational materials and curricula are of critical importance, a curriculum is only as good as the educators implementing it. Ensuring educators are prepared in effective science education pedagogy requires educator professional development opportunities that emphasize both science content understanding and pedagogical knowledge and skills. The 4-H Youth Development Program relies heavily on volunteers – adults and teens – who facilitate science activities with youth. While one-time, in-person workshops of short duration educational opportunities represent the most common approach used, these are generally considered to be ineffective because they do not model effective science pedagogy and do not produce significant change in educators’ practice (Guskey & Yoon, 2009). In contrast, California 4-H strives to implement professional development strategies of extended duration that promote active learning, emphasize pedagogical knowledge, are embedded in authentic contexts, and provide connections to broader organizational efforts (Smith, 2013; Smith & Schmitt-McQuitty, 2013).

The “Step-Up” Incremental Training Model (Smith & Enfield, 2002) is one example of a professional development model that utilizes many of the elements described above. Specifically, this model targets 4-H teen volunteers who implement science curriculum materials with younger youth. This strategy employs a sequence of three workshops that engage teen volunteers in modeling hands-on, inquiry-based science activities and practicing effective teaching techniques. The workshops alternate with the implementation of the science curriculum in non-formal education settings; allowing time for activity implementation between workshops provides opportunities for individual and group reflections on practice over a period of several weeks. Research objectives for the “Step-Up” model focused on changes in the teen volunteers’ understanding and use of effective questioning strategies and inquiry teaching methods. Analysis of pre-/post-survey and observational data provided statistically significant (p < .01) evidence that this model was effective in improving teens’ understanding and abilities to use effective questioning strategies and inquiry methods (Smith, Enfield, Meehan, & Klingborg, 2004). Furthermore, the teens were successful in the role of cross-age science teachers. Data on critical thinking skills revealed statistically significant (p < .05) improvements.

Conclusion

The California 4-H SET Initiative is focused on helping improve youth scientific literacy in non-formal settings while contributing to the field of research on non-formal science education. Through integrated efforts that involve research-based practices, California 4-H has built capacity within its organizational structure – county-based 4-H programs throughout the state – to offer effective science programming. These efforts support and complement school-based science education to help youth advance their understanding of and interest in science.

For more information about 4-H and to access 4-H SET curriculum materials, please visit http://4h.ucanr.edu/

 References

Campbell, D., Trzesniewski, K., Nathaniel, K., Enfield, R., & Erbstein, N. (2013). Positive youth development merits state investment. California Agriculture, 67(1), 38-46.

Enfield, R. P., Schmitt-McQuitty, L., & Smith, M. H. (2007). The development and evaluation of experiential learning workshops for 4-H volunteers. Journal of Extension [On-line], 45(1) Article 1FEA2.

Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development? Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495-500.

Lerner, R.M., Lerner, J.V., Lewin-Bizan, S., Bowers, E.P., Boyd, M.J., Mueller, M.K., Schmid, K.L., & Napolitano, C.M. (2011). Positive youth development: Processes, programs, and problematics. Journal of Youth Development, 6(3), 40-64

Smith, M. H., & Enfield, R. P. (2002). Training 4-H teen facilitators in inquiry-based science methods: The evaluation of a “step-up” incremental training model. Journal of Extension [On-line], 40(6).

Smith et al., (2011). Bio-Security in 4-H Animal Science. University of California, Davis, CA: ANR Communication Services.

Smith, M. (2013). Findings show lesson study can be an effective model for professional development of 4-H volunteers. California Agriculture, 67(1), 54-61.

Smith, M.H. & Schmitt-McQuitty, L. (2013). More effective professional development can help 4-H volunteers address need for youth scientific literacy. California Agriculture, 67(1), 54-61.

Smith, M. H., & Enfield, R. P. (2002). Training 4-H teen facilitators in inquiry-based science methods: The evaluation of a “step-up” incremental training model. Journal of Extension [On-line], 40(6).

Smith, M. H., Enfield, R. P., Meehan, C. L., & Klingborg, D. J. (2004). Animal ambassadors…4-H teens learn to lead science program for kids. California Agriculture, 58(4): 209-212.

Steven Worker, Martin Smith, Andrea Ambrose, Lynn Schmitt-McQuitty are with the California State 4-H Office at the University of California’s Division of Agricultural and Natural Resources. Steven, Martin, and Lynn are members of CSTA

 

Written by Guest Contributor

From time to time CSTA receives contributions from guest contributors. The opinions and views expressed by these contributors are not necessarily those of CSTA. By publishing these articles CSTA does not make any endorsements or statements of support of the author or their contribution, either explicit or implicit. All links to outside sources are subject to CSTA’s Disclaimer Policy: http://www.classroomscience.org/disclaimer.

Leave a Reply

LATEST POST

California Science Curriculum Framework Now Available

Posted: Tuesday, March 14th, 2017

The pre-publication version of the new California Science Curriculum Framework is now available for download. This publication incorporates all the edits that were approved by the State Board of Education in November 2016 and was many months in the making. Our sincere thanks to the dozens of CSTA members were involved in its development. Our appreciation is also extended to the California Department of Education, the State Board of Education, the Instructional Quality Commission, and the Science Curriculum Framework and Evaluation Criteria Committee and their staff for their hard work and dedication to produce this document and for their commitment to the public input process. To the many writers and contributors to the Framework CSTA thanks you for your many hours of work to produce a world-class document.

For tips on how to approach this document see our article from December 2016: California Has Adopted a New Science Curriculum Framework – Now What …? If you would like to learn more about the Framework, consider participating in one of the Framework Launch events (a.k.a. Rollout #4) scheduled throughout 2017.

The final publication version (formatted for printing) will be available in July 2017. This document will not be available in printed format, only electronically.

Written by California Science Teachers Association

California Science Teachers Association

CSTA represents science educators statewide—in every science discipline at every grade level, Kindergarten through University.

Call for CSTA Awards Nominations

Posted: Monday, March 13th, 2017

The 2017 Award Season is now open! One of the benefits of being a CSTA member is your eligibility for awards as well as your eligibility to nominate someone for an award. CSTA offers several awards and members may nominate individuals and organizations for the Future Science Teacher Award, the prestigious Margaret Nicholson Distinguished Service Award, and the CSTA Distinguished Contributions Award (organizational award). May 9, 2017 is the deadline for nominations for these awards. CSTA believes that the importance of science education cannot be overstated. Given the essential presence of the sciences in understanding the past and planning for the future, science education remains, and will increasingly be one of the most important disciplines in education. CSTA is committed to recognizing and encouraging excellence in science teaching through the presentation of awards to science educators and organizations who have made outstanding contributions in science education in the state and who are poised to continue the momentum of providing high quality, relevant science education into the future. Learn More…

Written by California Science Teachers Association

California Science Teachers Association

CSTA represents science educators statewide—in every science discipline at every grade level, Kindergarten through University.

Call for Volunteers – CSTA Committees

Posted: Monday, March 13th, 2017

Volunteer

CSTA is now accepting applications from regular, preservice, and retired members to serve on our volunteer committees! CSTA’s all-volunteer board of directors invites you to consider maximizing your member experience by volunteering for CSTA. CSTA committee service offers you the opportunity to share your expertise, learn a new skill, or do something you love to do but never have the opportunity to do in your regular day. CSTA committee volunteers do some pretty amazing things: Learn More…

Written by California Science Teachers Association

California Science Teachers Association

CSTA represents science educators statewide—in every science discipline at every grade level, Kindergarten through University.

A Friend in CA Science Education Now at CSTA Region 1 Science Center

Posted: Monday, March 13th, 2017

by Marian Murphy-Shaw

If you attended an NGSS Rollout phase 1-3 or CDE workshops at CSTA’s annual conference you may recall hearing from Chris Breazeale when he was working with the CDE. Chris has relocated professionally, with his passion for science education, and is now the Executive Director at the Explorit Science Center, a hands-on exploration museum featuring interactive STEM exhibits located at the beautiful Mace Ranch, 3141 5th St. in Davis, CA. Visitors can “think it, try it, and explorit” with a variety of displays that allow visitors to “do science.” To preview the museum, or schedule a classroom visit, see www.explorit.org. Learn More…

Written by Marian Murphy-Shaw

Marian Murphy-Shaw

Marian Murphy-Shaw is the student services director at Siskiyou County Office of Education and is CSTA’s Region 1 Director and chair of CSTA’s Policy Committee.

Learning to Teach in 3D

Posted: Monday, March 13th, 2017

by Joseph Calmer

Probably like you, NGSS has been at the forefront of many department meetings, lunch conversations, and solitary lesson planning sessions. Despite reading the original NRC Framework, the Ca Draft Frameworks, and many CSTA writings, I am still left with the question: “what does it actually mean for my classroom?”

I had an eye-opening experience that helped me with that question. It came out of a conversation that I had with a student teacher. It turns out that I’ve found the secret to learning how to teach with NGSS: I need to engage in dialogue about teaching with novice teachers. I’ve had the pleasure of teaching science in some capacity for 12 years. During that time pedagogy and student learning become sort of a “hidden curriculum.” It is difficult to plan a lesson for the hidden curriculum; the best way is to just have two or more professionals talk and see what emerges. I was surprised it took me so long to realize this epiphany. Learn More…

Written by Guest Contributor

From time to time CSTA receives contributions from guest contributors. The opinions and views expressed by these contributors are not necessarily those of CSTA. By publishing these articles CSTA does not make any endorsements or statements of support of the author or their contribution, either explicit or implicit. All links to outside sources are subject to CSTA’s Disclaimer Policy: http://www.classroomscience.org/disclaimer.